The scholarly publishing landscape of ethnobotany in the Philippines

Open

Venice Nicole Magsayo, Ma. Joselle Pulmones, Nyanha Caira Canton, Chastine Hazel Fiel, Kyra Alexa Kwong, Febie Anne Sanchez, Kurt Bryant B. Bacharo

2024 Ethnobotany Research and Applications Vol. 28 Review Cited by 2 Quartile

Abstract

Background: Ethnobotany deals with the investigation on the interaction and inter-relationship between plants and human societies. Owing to the research priorities in finding new drugs, conserving plant biodiversity, and documentation of vanishing indigenous cultures, bibliometric analysis on ethnobotany had been conducted in various countries to assess its research productivity. This bibliometric analysis purposively summarizes the current scholarly publishing state of ethnobotany in the Philippines. Methods: All published primary articles on ethnobotany that has been conducted in the Philippines from 2001 to 2022 and available in Google Scholar were retrieved, screened, and analyzed using three bibliometric indicators namely quantity, performance, and structural. Results: A total of 163 articles has been retrieved related to Philippine ethnobotany published in 106 journals. The journal Biodiversitas was shown to have the highest number of articles published (4.91%) while the Journal of Ethnopharmacology was the most cited. Contributors included 370 authors and co-authors affiliated to more than 100 local and foreign institutions. Of these, G.J. Alejandro was identified as the most prolific author (18 articles, 343 citations) while the University of Santo Tomas was the most productive institution (22 articles). International collaboration revealed that Filipino researchers collaborated with 13 different institutions located in seven countries. In terms of funding, only less than half of the total articles examined (46.01%) declared to received financial support. The main research theme in the entire study period centered around medicinal plants while the most recent focused on the different indigenous communities in Mindanao Island and the field of ethnophycology. Conclusions: Despite these developments, potential predatory publishing practices and parachute science are documented. The former can threaten the quality and credibility of research outputs whereas the latter can be exacerbated when local scientists and Indigenous Peoples are not empowered to participate in the scholarly process. Moving forward, we call for the participation of current and future researchers in the field of Philippine ethnobotany and all fields to raise the bar of scholarly publishing high. Carrying the best practices should be adopted across all publishing landscape. © 2024, Ilia State University, Institute of Botany, Department of Ethnobotany. All rights reserved.

Affiliations

Basic Education Department, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, 6000, Philippines; Biology Department, University of San Carlos, Cebu City, 6000, Philippines

Research at a Glance

Premium content — register to unlock

Research at a Glance

Register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Premium content — register to unlock

Topics & SDG Alignment

Register to unlock

Collaboration

Premium content — register to unlock

Collaboration

Register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Premium content — register to unlock

Author Profile (Selected)

Register to unlock

References Overview

Premium content — register to unlock

References Overview

Register to unlock

Journal & Source

Premium content — register to unlock

Journal & Source

Register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Premium content — register to unlock

Metadata & Integrity

Register to unlock